Archive for the ‘Transit’ Category

World’s First and Largest Urban PRT System Announced

Tuesday, December 13th, 2011

 We are posting ULTra Global’s recent press release here due to its significance. This is not an endorsement of ULTra over any other PRT system, only a recognition of the significance of this milestone for PRT in general.

The Punjab Government has awarded a contract for the world’s first urban Passenger Rapid Transport (PRT) system in Amritsar, India to Ultra Fairwood.  

At peak capacity the PRT system can carry up to 100,000 passengers a day on a 3.3km elevated guideway in over 200 specialist vehicles between seven stations, making it the world’s largest PRT system to date. 

Elevated Guideways

Elevated Guideways

Financed entirely by private funding on a build, own, operate transfer (BOOT) basis, the passenger services will go live in 2014. 

Although the cost of the scheme is subject to commercial confidentiality, it demonstrates that a large scale urban PRT system can be delivered on a financially viable, fare-based model and offer very real returns for financial backers.

The Ultra PRT system uses driverless, electric-battery powered, computer driven, zero emission vehicles called “pods” which :

  • can each carry 4-6 people in privacy and comfort
  • provide an on-demand, non-stop journey to anywhere on the system
  • use one third of the energy of a car,  and are virtually silent with no emissions
  • travel on a segregated guideway that can run over/alongside roads, rail tracks and buildings
  • never get held up by congestion, so reduce travel time
Bi-level Station

Bi-level Station

Amritsar is home to the holiest shrine of Sikhs, the Golden Temple, and is rich in historical, religious and heritage sites.  As such it’s a big draw for large numbers of visitors, especially during festivals and religious events, as pilgrims flock to the area.  Up to 500,000 people visit the Golden Temple on important religious festival days.  The PRT system will ease congestion and reduce the current long travel transit times.

The route will focus on taking passengers from the railway and bus stations to the Golden Temple and will:

  • take  35% of daily visitors to the Golden Temple
  • save up to 30 minutes on the current journey times
  • attract passengers from a wide geographic and demographic profile, from regular commuters to “one off day trip” users.
  • run from 04.00 – 24.00 seven days a week
  • charge fares competitive with alternative modes such as taxis and autorickshaws. 

 “The Punjab Government and city of Amritsar are leading the world in the application of a PRT system to provide volume transport in a major city environment.  As a result Ultra Fairwood is also in discussions with the authorities in other major Asian cities which suffer from major transportation infrastructure issues – congestion, space constraints, pollution problems, capacity restrictions and passenger service issues. The Ultra PRT system can help to solve these issues. 

“In one city by installing a PRT system we could potentially reduce a current journey of up to one hour in peak hours to around  seven minutes, in another country we may be able to reduce the number of cars on a major city’s streets by up to 20%.  People are at last starting to understand how this innovative technology can play a role in city transport solutions” said Ultra Fairwood’s CFO and Deputy CEO Alan Moore.

A sentiment echoed by Fraser Brown, MD of Ultra Global PRT, “The pod PRT system is an idea whose time has well and truly come.  Using British technology and know how, we’ve proved it works at Heathrow and now with Fairwood we’re creating bigger systems, on larger  routes, with more stations and pods. 

“We’ll be carrying 35% of the visitors in the area and removing 2.2m car trips in Amritsar per annum. It’s the future of environmental green travel. 

“Research has shown that by 2020, there could be between 50 to over 600 PRT system installations world wide. A real achievement for a system that came out of research from Bristol University.”

“Ultra Global sees the confidence that the Punjab Government have shown in PRT as further evidence of the growing sentiment amongst architects, transport planners and governments that PRT systems can sustainably and quickly transform an urban transport environment and provide users and other stakeholders with another viable transport mode in which to manage their cities and campuses.” Brown adds.

Ultra Fairwood is a collaboration between Ultra and Fairwood created in 2010 bringing the revolutionary Ultra technology to Asia.   Ultra Fairwood conceives, designs, finances, constructs and operates complete PRT solutions, typically on a BOOT basis.  The company is working on PRT projects for cities, campus environments and airports.

Personal Rapid Transit Influence on Mode Shift to Transit

Sunday, October 23rd, 2011

Recent work by Joerg Schweizer  finds a significant mode shift to public transit when the level of service is similar to that of personal rapid  transit (PRT). Professor Schweizer conducted stated-preference public surveys in European cities that make no mention of PRT but ask people to choose the transit characteristics that would make them switch from private to public modes. When offered a nearby station, a clean and air-conditioned vehicle, short waiting times, no transfers and a guaranteed seat, (a combination only feasible with personal rapid transit) transit mode share increased dramatically – often by more than double. Note that the surveys assume a widespread system with fares equivalent to present public transit fares. Professor Schweizer also quotes research by Tegner with similar results.

Some Thoughts on Group Rapid Transit

Wednesday, June 29th, 2011

The Morgantown PRT system which has been operating in Morgantown West Virginia since 1975 is actually a group rapid transit system (GRT). GRT systems have larger vehicles and passengers are typically required to share rides with others going to the same destination(s). These vehicles also typically accommodate standees thereby fitting more passengers into a smaller space. As accustomed as we are to large trains and buses, many believe that larger GRT vehicles make more sense than smaller personal rapid transit (PRT) vehicles. But do they?

Morgantown PRT

Morgantown PRT

The answer is not simple. It depends on many factors. Larger vehicles require larger stations and more substantial guideways. Thus, the capital costs can be higher. The operating savings resulting from carrying more passengers in fewer vehicles can be offset by the additional cost of running larger empty vehicles during off-peak periods.

Because of the standees, GRT vehicles cannot accelerate or decelerate as quickly as PRT vehicles can. This requires greater separation (headway, or time between vehicles) in order to meet the same safety criteria. This in turn means that GRT’s capacity gains are less than would be expected by just comparing vehicle capacities.

2getthere GRT

2getthere GRT

GRT cannot match the high level of service of PRT where everyone gets a seat, nobody waits for more than about a minute and trips are nonstop. With GRT, seats are in relatively short supply. Passengers have to wait (typically up to about five minutes) for other passengers to fill the vehicle. In addition each vehicle may make a number of stops along the way.

The requirement for GRT vehicles to wait for passengers to arrive who all share the same destination(s) means that GRT does not function very well when there are numerous stations in a system. Either the wait times get quite long or most vehicles are nowhere near full.

Nonetheless, GRT can carry more passengers per hour along a guideway. Increased guideway capacity can be a useful attribute for a networked PRT system where there is intense demand between a few station pairs, but the majority of the demand can be handled by PRT vehicles. In this scenario, GRT service between the busy station pairs can be integrated with PRT service elsewhere. If the GRT vehicles can run on the PRT track, it could be feasible to intermingle the vehicles, changing the fleet mix to meet demand fluctuations. Vectus is developing a GRT vehicle that will run on their PRT track. Another solution that could achieve a similar result could be to platoon PRT vehicles together (either physically or electronically). Forming and breaking the platoons in stations could eliminate safety issues associated with doing so on the fly.

Personal rapid transit systems may be well advised to develop ride sharing/platooning/GRT options to meet the capacity demands that are bound to arise as applications become larger and more diverse. Some may bemoan the need to sacrifice some of the “personal” aspects but, in many countries, the demand for mass transportation will predominate. The distinction between PRT and GRT may become blurred.

How to Get Into PRT

Saturday, January 23rd, 2010

Interest in personal rapid transit (PRT) is growing rapidly, and a wide variety of entities are now looking at purchasing, supporting and/or facilitating PRT applications of vastly differing sizes and complexities. Many of these entities are relatively new to the concept of PRT and, although enamored by it, may lack the skills to adequately protect themselves and/or their communities from the risks that may be involved. PRT is very easy for the user to understand, but it incorporates a number of technical aspects not easy for the owner to understand. Even those well versed in conventional transit will usually require many years of study and involvement before they comprehend all of the nuances associated with PRT.

There are now a number of PRT suppliers with paying clients and commercially available systems. Other entrepreneurs are developing new systems – each with the stated potential to provide even better service for less cost. Few system developers have the capital to both develop and commercialize their systems independently, and many are seeking projects suitable to allow the development process to be folded into a commercial application. This type of arrangement can bring benefits to all parties, but the risks must be thoroughly understood.

While the developer may (or may not) understand all of the risks involved, it is unlikely that the party, to be the beneficiary of the ultimate application, has the technical expertise to truly understand what they are getting into and how to mitigate their risks. In addition, the beneficiary needs the tools necessary to fully understand the different options that are available, in order to receive a PRT application that meets its needs. If one company is offering what seems like an unbeatable deal, there will often be others available with different offers that may or may not better meet the beneficiary’s needs and, therefore, may warrant consideration.

We have added a new section to our website to provide an overview of the activities involved in a typical PRT project. However, not all of these activities are necessarily required for each project. This section is not intended to be exhaustive, just to outline the types of things that need to be done to help ensure successful PRT projects.

Transportation is Broken – a New Solution is Needed

Tuesday, September 15th, 2009

Transportation is Broken – a New Solution is Needed

A review of the major characteristics of our urban transportation system quickly reveals that it is thoroughly broken. Of even greater concern is the fact that most of the solutions currently gaining traction will do little to solve the most pressing problems.

The problem

Let’s start by comparing how various indicators have grown relative to population growth over the past 20 years. Table 1 lists major transportation characteristics and their growth over a 20 year period. The horizontal red line shows the U.S. population growth over that time (about 24%), and the discussion below compares the growth of each characteristic to the population growth, in order to put things in perspective (if nothing changed, these characteristics could all be expected to grow at the same rate as the population has grown).

1990-2010-skewed

Accidents. The total number of accidents has actually declined. While this is the only factor to decline, and clearly a good thing, it is still not nearly enough. Over 40,000 people are still killed on US roads annually (compared with total U.S. deaths in Vietnam – 58,159; Iraq – 4,334; 9/11 – 2,993), and road traffic injuries are one of the top three causes of death for people aged between 5 and 44 years worldwide. Lest you think the US is much safer than the rest of the world, we are not. There are approximately 60 countries with lower death rates per 100,000 population. Improving safety is no easy feat, since advances in safety technology can be easily offset by societal changes, such as texting while driving.

Use of Public Transportation. Transit use grew a little more than population but much less than passenger vehicle miles traveled. Try as we might, we just cannot convince people to leave their cars for transit. During the recent period of high gasoline prices, a small jump in transit use was experienced. This caused problems for transit agencies around the country, because they lose money on each rider! This unsustainable practice was exacerbated by reduced tax-based subsidies and meant that many agencies had to reduce service at the precise time they should have been increasing it. Subsidized transit systems may be necessary to ensure that the disadvantaged have reasonably priced transportation. However, a sustainable transit system, that can rise to meet changing demand, needs to cover at least its operating expenses from the fare box – something that few US transit systems can accomplish.

Transportation Energy Use. This is growing an alarming 50% faster than the population and a large portion of this energy comes from foreign oil suppliers. 96.6% of all transportation energy use is petroleum-based and any growth at all is problematic. As cheap oil resources are depleted, and as countries such as India and China dramatically increase their oil use, cost of oil is likely to rise steeply and cause serious problems for transportation.

Delays Caused by Congestion. As more and more cities face rush-hour gridlock (and rush-hours get longer and longer), this factor is growing twice as fast as the population and congestion now wastes 3.5 billion man-hours every year. We do not seem to be able to build ourselves out of this problem. Consider I-25 through Denver; Two years after a major improvement project took it from six to eight lanes plus light rail, it regularly suffers congestion similar to what it did before the construction. Paradoxically, even in bad traffic, the light rail train seldom passes the automobiles. This is because the light rail system only averages under 25 mph. By the way, the light rail’s two lines cost about the same to build as the eight lanes of highway, even though they carry much less traffic.

Passenger Vehicle Miles Travelled. The amount of driving we do is outgrowing the population by almost three times! This high level of passenger vehicle use is widely seen as being unsustainable. The energy used (and the related foreign oil dependence) is seen by many as being the major issue. However, automobile use brings numerous other problems. While accidents and congestion are discussed separately, two other problems are real estate/infrastructure and automobile manufacture. Each car typically requires four parking spaces (one at home, one at work and two others for intermittent use). The cost of this infrastructure (these spaces are typically paved and often roofed) and the street/road/highway infrastructure, needed to support our automobile use, is enormous. At the same time, the real estate used to support automobiles increases the cost of other utilities and decreases the quality of urban living. Furthermore, the cost of highways is increasing as design standards are continually raised in an attempt to reduce accidents. In addition, the tax revenue to support this infrastructure has not kept pace with the need, and we are likely to face increased taxes and/or more and more tolled highways. The cost to society of individual automobile ownership is rising as we strive to make cars more sustainable. It’s time we took a long hard look at what automobile ownership really costs.

Logistics Costs. These are the costs of moving goods and they have increased far faster than the population has grown. At this pace, logistics costs are set to have major impacts on our economy. Part of the reason is that we move a very large proportion of goods by semi trucks rather than rail. Rail is a far more efficient way to move goods, but we lack the infrastructure to economically collect and distribute goods at the ends of the rail lines. Shipping suffered from a similar problem, wherein the cost of handling goods in harbors exceeded the cost of shipping them over the seas. This changed with the advent of container ships. A similar revolution is needed for rail.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Transportation accounted for 47% of the net increase in total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions since 1990. It currently contributes 34% of all greenhouse gas emissions. Reducing transportation-related greenhouse gases requires reducing the amount of energy used by transportation, as well as changing the primary source of that energy.

A solution

Think transit is the solution? Think again. In the U.S., transit uses (wastes) as much energy per passenger mile as the automobile. This is largely because trains and buses run around empty most of the day. Transit infrastructure is expensive to build, consumes much real estate and resources, and its construction contributes significantly to greenhouse gases. High speed rail and air travel may be good solutions for long distances, but both suffer a last mile (or last many mile) problem and do nothing for urban mobility.

It is amazing to think that we are still using the stagecoach model for transit. A stagecoach runs on fixed routes with designated stops. There is seldom a stop at the desired origin and destination (the first/last mile problem mentioned above). The vehicle accommodates many people, to spread the cost of the driver, and has to stop whenever somebody needs to get on or off. All we have done to this model is make the vehicles bigger, turn the stops into stations and the routes into corridors. The ride may be a little smoother and the speed a little higher, but the quality of service has hardly improved. A rail system, with top speeds in the fifties and stations every mile, has an average speed under 25mph. “Modern” street cars often have average speeds in the single digits. It is no wonder transit only achieves a mode share of around 4%. The model is broken and we need to quit trying to fix it. We need a new model.

What if you did not have to wait for transit, you always got a seat, and it took you where you want to go without stopping? Would you use it? The only mode of transportation that currently operates this way is the automobile at 3a.m. Even then, stops at “dumb” traffic signals for no crossing traffic at all are often required. Amazingly enough, transit that operates this way was invented over fifty years ago. It is called personal rapid transit (PRT) and it can be likened to automated (driverless) taxis operating on a system of guideways. The reasons PRT could help solve our transportation problems are:

1. It has a high level of service (more like a car than a bus) and really can attract drivers from their cars.

  1. It uses about a third the energy of most other modes.
  2. It is electrically powered so, as we convert the grid to renewable sources of energy, we automatically also convert PRT-based transportation.
  3. It has proven to be about a hundred times safer than conventional transit.
  4. Elevated or buried (PRT tunnels are much smaller to move the same number of people) guideways do not use up real estate or cause neighborhood severance.
  5. Small vehicle sizes (like a small automobile) require minimal infrastructure.
  6. Each automated T-Pod (transportation pod) will be reused fifty or more times a day – an efficient use of manufacturing resources and a reduced need for parking.
  7. In off-peak times, unused T-Pods wait in stations or depots – there is much reduced empty vehicle movement.

Table 2 below shows my opinion of the extent to which various solutions are likely to have a positive impact on the transportation problems mentioned at the beginning of this discussion. 0 = no impact, 1 = some impact, 2 = significant impact. Certainly, some will argue with my ratings, which are based on my own opinions and analyses. In addition, PRT has yet to be proven in large applications. The point is that PRT appears to have the potential for quite significant impacts across the board, yet it is receiving attention that is dramatically disproportionate to this potential.

comparison-chart

References:

US DOT Bureau of Transportation Statistics

World Health Organization

US DOT Bureau of Transportation Statistics

US Department of Energy

American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy

Steiner, C., $20 Per Gallon

2009 Urban Mobility Report

Federal Highway Administration

Federal Highway Administration

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

U.S. Department of Transportation

Muller, P.J., Personal Rapid Transit Safety and Security on a University Campus

PRT could help solve rail dilemma

Saturday, June 13th, 2009

People generally prefer rail to bus service. Rail usually provides a smoother, faster and more reliable ride. However, the faster service comes at the expense of fewer stations. Feeding a train system with buses does not work well because people don’t like to use two services that can both involve long, unpredictable wait times.

This dilemma can be solved by integrating a personal rapid transit (PRT) collector/distributor system into the rail system. People can be expected to view the combined systems almost as one, since the PRT system involves almost no waiting (typically less than one minute). The cost savings of the rail stations that can be eliminated could go a long way to paying for the PRT system while allowing the trains to run faster, The combined systems will provide a much higher level of service with wider coverage, thereby enticing a higher ridership. A bonus would be the increase in land values of the wider area within walking distance of the combined systems.

 rail-prt4

 

 

The Swedes are ahead of us on this concept and are seriously investigating PRT last-mile service between commuter rail and downtown business districts. The UAE has started construction of an auto-free city (Masdar) dependent on PRT for internal transportation. The British have a PRT system about to go into public service at Heathrow Airport. We Americans need to start catching up!